Fenomena Korupsi Indonesia: Perpektif Teoritik Struktural Fungsional, Analisa Kritis dalam Kerangka Dinamika Konflik Sosial Politik dan Dialektika Antara State, Political Society dan Civil Society

Authors

  • Adam Amin Bahar Program Studi Ilmu Sosial, FISIP, Universitas Airlangga
  • jokhanan Stikosa-AWS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37826/spektrum.v6i1.49

Keywords:

Fenomena Korupsi Indonesia, Kelompok Sosial Politik, Struktural Fungsional

Abstract

Fenomena korupsi di Indonesia saat ini seperti menjadi fenomena yang lazim atau biasa di masyarakat, maraknya pelanggaran penyelewengan kekuasaan dan hukum untuk menjalankan aktivitas korupsi menjadi sebuah realitas sosial di kehidupan masyarakat bangsa Indonesia. Banyak contoh kasus yang terjadi saat ini, seperti contoh kasus e-KTP yang dilakukan oleh terdakwa Setyo Novanto yang juga selaku mantan ketua DPR RI di dewan pemerintahan Indonesia. Selain itu masih banyak lagi aktivitas-aktivitas korupsi terjadi di Indonesia sebagai negara pemerintahan. Kelompok sosial Politik dan kelompok sosial penduduk di masyarakat, baik itu sudah termasuk tindakan kriminal (pidana dan/atau perdata) maupun tidak termasuk sebagai penyelewengan atau kesalahan secara hukum. Artikel ini menggunakan metode studi pustaka dan dengan pendekatan Kualitatif. Dengan kajian dan analisa fenomena tersebut secara teoritik khususnya dalam perspektif teori sosial Struktural Fungsional, teori Neo Fungsional, Teori Neo Marxian hingga dianalisa dengan perspektif teori kritis dengan mahzab Frankfurt School. Hasil dari artikel ilmiah ini adalah sebuah kompilasi Teoritik Perpektif Teori Struktural Fungsional, Neo Fungsional, Teori Neo Marxian dan Teori Kritis (Frankfurt School) tentang Realitas Fenomena Korupsi Indonesia dalam kerangka dinamika konflik sosial politik dan dialektika antara State, Political Society dan Civil Society.

 

References

Bates, T. R. (1975). Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas, 36(2), 351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708933
Bedirhanoglu, P. (2007). The Neoliberal Discourse on Corruption as a Means of Consent Building:Reflections from Post-Crisis Turkey. Third World Quarterly , 28 (7), 1239-1254.
Garnham, N. (2007). Habermas and the public sphere. Global Media and Communication, 3(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766507078417
Gephart, M. (2015). Contested meaning in the anti-corruption Discourse: International and Local Narrative in the Case of Paraguay. Critical Policy Studies , 9 (2), 119-138.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Contributions To a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. https://doi.org/10.2307/2941077
Hadiz, V. (2006). Corruption and Neo-liberal Reform: Market and Predatory Power in Indonesia and Southeast Asia. In R. Robinson, The Neo-Liberal Revolution: Forging the Market State. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heidenheimer, A., & Johnston, M. (2002). Political Theory: Concepts and Contexts. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Holmwood, J. (2005). Functionalism and its critics. Modern Social Theory: An Introduction, II, 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.eolss.net/Eolss-sampleAllChapter.aspx
Huntington. (2002). Modernization and Corruption. In A. Heidenheimer, & M. Johnston, Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts. Ne Jersey: Transaction Publisher.
Juwono, V. (2016). Berantas Korupsi: A Political History of Governance Reform and Anti-Corruption Initiatives in Indonesia 1945-2014. London School of Economy and Political Science.
Kellner, D. (2002). Theorizing Globalization. Sociological Theory, 20(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00165
Levine, N. (2012). Marx’s discourse with Hegel. Marx’s Discourse with Hegel. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360426
Lubenow, J. A. (2012). Public Sphere and Deliberative Democracy in Jürgen Habermas: Theorethical Model and Critical Discourses. American Journal of Sociological Research, 2(4), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.sociology.20120204.02
Naod, J., & Ritzer, G. (2001). Modern Sociological Theory. Teaching Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318728
Ritzer, G. (2011). Sociological Theory. Sociological Theory. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Sociological+Theory#5
Schutte, A. S. (2009). Government Policies and Civil Society Initiatives Against Corruption. In M. Bunte, & A. Ufen, Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Abingdon: Routledge.
Strøby Jensen, C. (2013). Neo-functionalism. In European Union Politics (pp. 59–70).



Bates, T. R. (1975). Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas, 36(2), 351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708933
Bedirhanoglu, P. (2007). The Neoliberal Discourse on Corruption as a Means of Consent Building:Reflections from Post-Crisis Turkey. Third World Quarterly , 28 (7), 1239-1254.
Garnham, N. (2007). Habermas and the public sphere. Global Media and Communication, 3(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766507078417
Gephart, M. (2015). Contested meaning in the anti-corruption Discourse: International and Local Narrative in the Case of Paraguay. Critical Policy Studies , 9 (2), 119-138.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Contributions To a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. https://doi.org/10.2307/2941077
Hadiz, V. (2006). Corruption and Neo-liberal Reform: Market and Predatory Power in Indonesia and Southeast Asia. In R. Robinson, The Neo-Liberal Revolution: Forging the Market State. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heidenheimer, A., & Johnston, M. (2002). Political Theory: Concepts and Contexts. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Holmwood, J. (2005). Functionalism and its critics. Modern Social Theory: An Introduction, II, 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.eolss.net/Eolss-sampleAllChapter.aspx
Huntington. (2002). Modernization and Corruption. In A. Heidenheimer, & M. Johnston, Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts. Ne Jersey: Transaction Publisher.
Juwono, V. (2016). Berantas Korupsi: A Political History of Governance Reform and Anti-Corruption Initiatives in Indonesia 1945-2014. London School of Economy and Political Science.
Kellner, D. (2002). Theorizing Globalization. Sociological Theory, 20(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00165
Levine, N. (2012). Marx’s discourse with Hegel. Marx’s Discourse with Hegel. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230360426
Lubenow, J. A. (2012). Public Sphere and Deliberative Democracy in Jürgen Habermas: Theorethical Model and Critical Discourses. American Journal of Sociological Research, 2(4), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.sociology.20120204.02
Naod, J., & Ritzer, G. (2001). Modern Sociological Theory. Teaching Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318728
Ritzer, G. (2011). Sociological Theory. Sociological Theory. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Sociological+Theory#5
Schutte, A. S. (2009). Government Policies and Civil Society Initiatives Against Corruption. In M. Bunte, & A. Ufen, Democratization in Post-Suharto Indonesia. Abingdon: Routledge.
Strøby Jensen, C. (2013). Neo-functionalism. In European Union Politics (pp. 59–70).

Downloads

Published

2018-06-25

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.